Cloud Wars
  • Home
  • Top 10
  • CW Minute
  • CW Podcast
  • Categories
    • AI and Copilots
    • Innovation & Leadership
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data
  • Member Resources
    • Cloud Wars AI Agent
    • Digital Summits
    • Guidebooks
    • Reports
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Tech Analysts
    • Marketing Services
  • Summit NA
  • Dynamics Communities
  • Ask Copilot
Twitter Instagram
  • Summit NA
  • Dynamics Communities
  • AI Copilot Summit NA
  • Ask Cloud Wars
Twitter LinkedIn
Cloud Wars
  • Home
  • Top 10
  • CW Minute
  • CW Podcast
  • Categories
    • AI and CopilotsWelcome to the Acceleration Economy AI Index, a weekly segment where we cover the most important recent news in AI innovation, funding, and solutions in under 10 minutes. Our goal is to get you up to speed – the same speed AI innovation is taking place nowadays – and prepare you for that upcoming customer call, board meeting, or conversation with your colleague.
    • Innovation & Leadership
    • CybersecurityThe practice of defending computers, servers, mobile devices, electronic systems, networks, and data from malicious attacks.
    • Data
  • Member Resources
    • Cloud Wars AI Agent
    • Digital Summits
    • Guidebooks
    • Reports
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Tech Analysts
    • Marketing Services
    • Login / Register
Cloud Wars
    • Login / Register
Home » How to Use a RACI Framework in Security Incident Response
Cybersecurity

How to Use a RACI Framework in Security Incident Response

Robert WoodBy Robert WoodNovember 9, 2022Updated:November 28, 20224 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
RACI incident response
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Acceleration Economy Cybersecurity

“I thought you were taking care of that.”

That’s not what teams want to be saying when they’re scrambling during an incident response. Across all industries and public sectors, being intentional about roles and responsibilities can decrease communication issues and improve incident response. To help teams make progress toward the latter, this article, the first in a series on the top 10 things to do if you’ve been breached, discusses RACI (responsible, accountable, consulted, informed), a framework for defining roles and responsibilities.

What RACI Is

RACI is a method of defining ownership, accountability, and interface points for a particular project or function. The acronym stands for:

  • Responsible: the manager or team directly responsible for delivery
  • Accountable: the person with final authority over the effort
  • Consulted: a person or team that has unique insights and should be consulted to add value to the effort
  • Informed: a person or team who isn’t directly involved but should be kept up to speed

There are other variations on this framework where an “S” for “supported” could be added.

By facilitating a consistent approach to incident response, the RACI framework enables teams to have mutually understood expectations of their interactions and also to understand their interface points with each other and across the organization, removing the danger of ambiguity and assumptions. I believe the RACI framework should be viewed as a guideline and a living document, leaving flexibility for adaptation and growth.

Who Needs to Be Engaged

The primary teams or people that need to be engaged in the incident response process and part of your RACI matrix should be those in the critical path of containment, investigation, and recovery efforts. Each of these RACI definition areas, and which ones are a priority, will depend on the initial splash zone of an incident; however, it always helps for the following teams to be prepared:

  • The affected team: This is obvious, but the team or teams who were affected by a security incident should be heavily consulted for context, data, or more throughout and after the course of an incident.
  • Senior leadership: In most cases, senior leadership desires (or needs) to be informed of updates. There are cases where they may need to play a more active role as well, such as serving in a particular communications role.
  • Communications/PR: Somebody from a communications team will likely be taking on a responsible role for communicating outwardly and inwardly about the incident.
  • Data stewards: Depending on the organization or regulatory environment, data stewards may exist and need to be consulted on the intricacies of impacted data.
  • Legal: Legal teams are typically consulted from a breach notification standpoint. They should be managing liabilities around notices, credit monitoring, or handling other penalties that may arise as a result of a security incident.
  • Infrastructure/Information technology (IT): Depending on an incident’s scope, engaging the broader IT team to pull more logs or expertise around particular parts of the environment may be necessary.

Secondary Teams or Functions

Effective coordination around an incident isn’t likely to stop solely with the teams outlined above. The following teams or functions may not be top of mind, but they are still necessary to consider in the RACI process.

  • Sales or customer-facing teams: Working with teams that are directly engaging with customers (or prospects) to ensure that questions are answered correctly and the intended message is distributed is key. These relationships are built on trust; effective communication is a critical part of that.
  • Finance: Finance teams usually have a part to play in contract management as well as liability insurance. Consulting with your finance team around areas such as service-level agreements, insurance claims, and expectations set out in technology or service contracts, etc. can be tremendously helpful.
  • Product/project management: These roles are typically responsible for molding the roadmap for technology projects. Security incidents may very well throw a wrench into existing plans, and it’s important to begin conversations as early as is feasible to explore what changes in the roadmap may need to happen to balance the immediate security needs.

Retrospect and Review

I mentioned above that RACI definitions should ideally be living and adaptable. Following an incident, it’s important to set aside time for learning, retrospectives, and lessons learned. It’s natural to focus on process gaps or missing technical controls. Evaluating if the defined RACI structure for the incident team worked for or against a successful resolution is important. This is the time to get critical, re-evaluate, and re-establish as needed.

If you’re curious for more knowledge in this area, here is a fantastic resource from Atlassian that discusses broader functional roles and responsibilities in incident management.

CLICK HERE TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION ON LINKEDIN

Want more cybersecurity insights? Visit the Cybersecurity channel:

Acceleration Economy Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity featured finance framework infrastructure security teams
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
Robert Wood

Robert Wood is an Acceleration Economy Analyst focusing on Cybersecurity. He has led the development of multiple cybersecurity programs from the ground up at startups across the healthcare, cyber security, and digital marketing industries. Between experience with startups and application security consulting he has both leadership and hands on experience across technical domains such as the cloud, containers, DevSecOps, quantitative risk assessments, and more. Robert has a deep interest in the soft skills side of cybersecurity leadership, workforce development, communication and budget and strategy alignment. He is currently a Federal Civilian for an Executive Branch Agency and his views are his own, not representing that of the U.S. Government or any agency.

Related Posts

Snowflake Follows 34% RPO Spike with AI Data Cloud New-Product Blitz

June 5, 2025

How ServiceNow and EY Use AI to Merge Brand and Demand in B2B Marketing

June 5, 2025

AI Agent Interoperability: Community Project Details MCP Vulnerabilities, Enterprise Security Measures

June 5, 2025

Snowflake’s 1-2 Combo: RPO Jumps 34%, Then AI/Data Product Blitz

June 5, 2025
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts
  • Snowflake Follows 34% RPO Spike with AI Data Cloud New-Product Blitz
  • How ServiceNow and EY Use AI to Merge Brand and Demand in B2B Marketing
  • AI Agent Interoperability: Community Project Details MCP Vulnerabilities, Enterprise Security Measures
  • Snowflake’s 1-2 Combo: RPO Jumps 34%, Then AI/Data Product Blitz
  • AI Agent & Copilot Podcast: Security, Microsoft Copilot Partnership Insights from Zenity’s Michael Bargury

  • Ask Cloud Wars AI Agent
  • Tech Guidebooks
  • Industry Reports
  • Newsletters

Join Today

Most Popular Guidebooks

Accelerating GenAI Impact: From POC to Production Success

November 1, 2024

ExFlow from SignUp Software: Streamlining Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations and Business Central with AP Automation

September 10, 2024

Delivering on the Promise of Multicloud | How to Realize Multicloud’s Full Potential While Addressing Challenges

July 19, 2024

Zero Trust Network Access | A CISO Guidebook

February 1, 2024

Advertisement
Cloud Wars
Twitter LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Get In Touch
  • Marketing Services
  • Do not sell my information
© 2025 Cloud Wars.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • Login
Forgot Password?
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.